Research and data services

Make the evidence easier to check.

AI-assisted checks for research reports, data files and software decisions. Get a source trail, reproducible checks and a clear list of questions to resolve.

Describe your project — free enquirySee a source-linked report sample

Deliverables, timing and payment terms are agreed before work begins.

Report evidence check

Indicative $300

For research editors and teams preparing a report for publication.

Up to 20 agreed claims from one public report of up to 30 pages.

  • A claim register with source links and page references
  • Checks of units, dates and the support for each claim
  • Unresolved questions for your editor and one revision

Data quality review

Indicative $500

For teams combining data before an import or reporting cycle.

Two agreed CSV exports, up to 10,000 rows combined and 20 columns per file.

  • A field and unit mapping, plus duplicate candidates
  • Conflicting-record flags and an exception register
  • Reproducible validation checks for your team to review

Software vendor comparison

Quote after scope review

For teams choosing an AI tool or API for a specific workflow.

An agreed shortlist, your must-have requirements and public vendor documentation.

  • A requirements-to-evidence comparison with source links
  • Conflicting claims, documented limits and open questions
  • A short decision brief separating documented facts from assumptions

Illustrative example · synthetic data

A total can be correct twice and still be counted twice.

A cumulative indicator records 100 at Q1 and 130 at Q2. Adding the two values gives 230, but the latest cumulative total is 130.

What the review would record

  • The reporting period, unit and cumulative definition.
  • A flag asking which aggregation rule applies.
  • The proposed rule and its assumptions for your approval.

This example shows the approach; it is not a past client result.

Agree the work before committing

  1. Send a short description and, if available, a public or synthetic example.
  2. We assess feasibility and agree the outputs, acceptance checks, price, timing and permitted data.
  3. You review the delivered evidence and proposed corrections. Your team retains publication and data-change decisions.

These services use AI-assisted analysis. Source checks do not establish the truth of underlying research, and public documentation does not prove a vendor’s live performance. Specialist assurance or regulated advice requires a separately qualified provider.

Request a scope review

Describe the report, data issue or vendor decision you need help with. A public reference link is optional. Submission is free and does not commit you to a purchase.

Your project

Use a public HTTPS link without credentials, query parameters or fragments. You can leave this blank and describe your reference below.

Area of interest

Indicative pilot ranges, not an accepted quote or checkout.

Enquiry privacy

Your email, optional public URL, project description, chosen service and consent record are stored in this site’s private database for AI-assisted scope review and project-related follow-up. An enquiry is not an order or a mailing-list subscription; no automated email is sent and no response time is guaranteed.

Please do not submit confidential records, personal customer data, passwords, private links or wallet secrets. Sharing a public URL does not authorize private access or changes to your systems. A daily request-source hash limits abuse; this form does not store your raw IP address. Hosting infrastructure may retain operational logs. Recognized Bluesky or TikTok source and content labels may be saved with your enquiry; no tracking cookies are used for this.

For access, correction, deletion or withdrawal of follow-up consent, email handongzhen101@126.com with your enquiry reference.